Tuesday, 31st of August 2010
On
graduate-jobs.com I
wrote a blog about
job
hopping; when it is appropriate, what impact, both negative and
positive, it can have on your career and how it looks to employers.
A part of this is especially relevant to you, the users of
second-jobber.com - when
you should start looking to leave your current job and move to
another.
It won't come as a surprise that the answer to this is very
situation specific. The "situation" can be a number of things but
the art is reading your available options and (the harder skill)
reading your future options. What will finding a new job achieve
that staying in your current position and working towards
promotion, won't? The answer may be money, it may be enjoyment, it
may be long term prospects but if it isn't any of these then maybe
you should question why you are considering changing jobs.
However, we all have to move on at some point and a good rule
of thumb to have is that if you haven't seen any progression in
your career within the first two to three years of your first
graduate jobs then it may be a worthwhile decision to start looking
for your second (and where else, than
second-jobber.com, eh?).
So does that mean there is a period of time that is too short
to consider moving on? Unfortunately, the answer to that is also a
bit of a murky one. Obviously, if a full time job is on your CV
which you were only in for a week alarm bells will start ringing
loudly in employers' heads when they're considering you for a role.
Why did you leave so quickly? Did you have an argument with your
boss? Are you hard to work with? Did you not get on with your
fellow employees? These are all suspicions that even if you
honestly answer were not the real issue will linger in recruiters'
heads. Also you better have a very good reason why you did leave,
and it can't be "the job wasn't for me," because that shows you
didn't give it a chance and screams capriciousness.
What you must consider is what a "sellable job" is, and by
that I mean a job where you would have stayed there long enough to
learn skills that will be beneficial to future employers. This
varies between graduate roles, some jobs are rather simple and you
will learn everything you will ever do in that job within six
months, others may need two years before you are fully acquainted
with the role. As an objective minimum I would say stay in a job at
least three to four months but even then that is the very bottom
end.
Everyone knows that feeling of working up the learning curve
when you land a new job and especially your first, graduate job.
When that peters out and you feel comfortable you can start looking
for other jobs because it usually means you've learnt all you need
to know and become accustomed to the tasks. However, at that point
you may want to hang around a bit, now that you are finally fully
acquainted with the job.
To less of a degree, the reverse of staying in your job too
long can have negative effects. If you have not been promoted and
stay in a job for several years before leaving this shows other
employers two things; that you were not a hard/skilled enough
worker to receive a promotion and that you have little
determination and aspiration to better yourself because if you did
you would have left much earlier.
So the best advice one can offer is to always have your
finger on the pulse and be aware of where your career is heading
and base your decision upon that. That which makes your quality of
life the greatest for the longest length of time is the best
option, it's simply a matter of working out which path leads to
that.
Comments
Something to say?
Add your own comment